I loved the curated links segregated by categories at the bottom! Even though they were many I gave myself a goal to read them before your next issue! Please bring it back.
Regarding the Johnson & Johnson example how can we conclude it was due to the free market. Isn't it due to the legal loophole and the govt? In an actual free market ( Which is probably impossible) wouldn't the they be replaced by a better product? one that is not harmful?
Living on the edge-
"There's something wrong with the world today
I don't know what it is"
Time moves on, wrongdoings continue.
It's a good reading. Thanks.
Thanks, Kiran 🙏😃
I loved the curated links segregated by categories at the bottom! Even though they were many I gave myself a goal to read them before your next issue! Please bring it back.
Ah, this is a dilemma 😃 I assumed less is more.
Insightful, thanks for sharing
Regarding the Johnson & Johnson example how can we conclude it was due to the free market. Isn't it due to the legal loophole and the govt? In an actual free market ( Which is probably impossible) wouldn't the they be replaced by a better product? one that is not harmful?
Thoughts?
This is the same naive view of free markets that hasn't worked. When you are 50-60% of the market, competition doesn't work.